The question of changing the name of India to Bharat is a complex and controversial one, with many possible implications and perspectives. Here are some of the pros and cons of this decision, based on the information I found from the web:
Pros:
Changing the name to Bharat could be seen as a way of reclaiming the country's ancient and indigenous identity, which was suppressed by centuries of colonialism and foreign influence. Some supporters of the name change argue that Bharat reflects the country's cultural and linguistic diversity better than India, which is derived from a foreign word.
Changing the name to Bharat could also be a way of expressing the country's pride and confidence in its achievements and aspirations, especially as it hosts the G20 summit and becomes a global leader in various fields. Some proponents of the name change believe that Bharat would resonate more with the country's young and dynamic population, who are eager to shape their own future.
Changing the name to Bharat could also be a way of fostering national unity and solidarity, by emphasizing the common heritage and values that bind the people of the country together. Some advocates of the name change suggest that Bharat would help overcome the regional and communal divisions that have plagued the country's history and politics.
Cons:
Changing the name to Bharat could be seen as a way of imposing a narrow and exclusive vision of the country's identity, which ignores or marginalizes the diverse and pluralistic realities and voices that exist within it. Some critics of the name change argue that Bharat is associated with a Hindu nationalist agenda, which seeks to erase or subordinate the contributions and rights of other religious and ethnic groups.
Changing the name to Bharat could also be a way of distracting from or diverting attention from the real and pressing challenges and problems that face the country and its people, such as poverty, inequality, corruption, violence, environmental degradation, and public health crises. Some opponents of the name change believe that Bharat is a symbolic gesture that does not address or improve the material conditions and quality of life of millions of citizens.
Changing the name to Bharat could also be a way of creating confusion and misunderstanding, both domestically and internationally, as it would require a massive and costly overhaul of all official documents and materials that refer to the country. Some skeptics of the name change question whether it is worth spending time and resources on such a cosmetic change, when there are more urgent and important issues to deal with.
Public opinion:
According to a survey conducted by India Today in 2020, 73 per cent of respondents said they preferred to call their country India, while 27 per cent said they preferred Bharat. The survey also found that there were significant differences in preferences based on age, education, income, region, religion, and political affiliation.
According to another survey conducted by YouGov in 2021, 65 per cent of respondents said they supported changing the name of India to Bharat, while 35 per cent said they opposed it. The survey also found that there were variations in support based on gender, age, location, occupation, and social media usage.